Recovery

Is muscle soreness a sign of a good workout?

Arqam Waheed

There's a specific kind of satisfaction in not being able to walk down stairs the day after leg day. It feels like a receipt. You paid for something, and the bill arrived.

Then a few weeks later the same workout leaves you feeling fine, and a small worry creeps in. Are you not working hard enough any more? Has it stopped doing anything?

No. What stopped is the novelty. Soreness is a fairly good measure of how unfamiliar a workout was and a poor measure of almost everything else, including how much muscle it built.

The short version


The study that separated soreness from growth

The cleanest test of "no pain, no gain" is to make two groups do the same training, make only one of them sore, and see who grows. That's what Flann and colleagues did.

One group eased into eight weeks of hard eccentric cycling with a three-week gradual ramp-up, designed so they'd never show signs of damage. The other group was thrown straight into a damaging first session. The second group showed a blood marker of muscle damage at more than five times the level of the first, and reported more soreness and effort early on.

At the end, the two groups had the same increase in muscle size. Strength improved by 25 percent in one group and 26 percent in the other.

Same work, very different soreness, same result.

One study is one study, and cycling isn't lifting. But it lines up with a broader argument made in a 2018 review by Damas and colleagues: that muscle damage is not what drives growth, and that the body's early rebuilding work after unfamiliar training goes largely into repair rather than new muscle.

Why soreness is such a noisy signal

Even if damage did matter, soreness would be a poor way to measure it. Schoenfeld and Contreras pointed out in their review that perceived soreness correlates poorly with the timing and size of accepted markers of muscle damage, such as lost strength and swelling. Soreness can peak before the swelling has even shown up.

They also noted how variable it is from person to person. Some experienced lifters get sore after nearly every session. Others barely feel anything. Neither group is training better because of it, and the review notes there's no evidence that muscle growth is reduced in people who don't get sore.

The same review mentions that exercises placing peak tension on a muscle while it's lengthened tend to cause more soreness than ones loading it while it's shortened. Whether that difference changes how much the muscle grows hadn't been studied when they wrote it. So a deep-stretch exercise leaving you sorer than a machine that loads the top of the movement tells you about the exercise, and says nothing yet about the result.

That variability is the core problem with using soreness as a scorecard. A measurement that differs wildly between two people doing the same work is measuring something about the people, not the work.


Why it fades, and why that's fine

A new program can leave you sore for days, and the same session repeated a few weeks later often barely registers. This is the repeated bout effect, and it's one of the most reliable findings in this area: after one bout of unfamiliar, especially eccentric, exercise, the muscle becomes much more resistant to damage from the next one. A review by McHugh lays out the candidate mechanisms, from changes in how muscle fibres are recruited to structural changes in the muscle itself. The mechanism is still debated. The effect isn't.

The review by Schoenfeld and Contreras adds a detail worth knowing: even lighter sessions help protect a muscle against soreness from later ones.

To be fair to that review, its authors leaned the other way on the bigger question. They suggested there may be some justification for seeking muscle damage if maximal growth is the goal, and that strategies built to minimise soreness might compromise growth. The later work above, Flann's trial and the 2018 Damas review, argues against that. It's a real disagreement, and the more recent evidence sits on the side of damage not being required.

So the fading of soreness is your body getting used to the work. It's what's supposed to happen. Chasing the feeling back by constantly changing exercises means you'll keep paying the cost of novelty without good evidence of getting more for it.

That may be part of why program hopping can feel productive at the start of each new plan: every switch brings the novelty, and the soreness, back. We wrote about that pattern in why every program works for three weeks.

What soreness actually tells you

It's not useless. It's just answering a different question.

Soreness after a session tells you that something was new: a new exercise, a deeper stretch than usual, more sets than usual, or a return after time off. That's information. It's just not information about whether the session was effective.

The useful version comes the other way round. Soreness in the muscle you're about to train, at the start of the session, is worth noticing. It suggests that muscle hasn't fully recovered from last time. It's one of the two things we treat as a sign of under-recovery, alongside a pattern of lifts going backwards.

Even then, one sore start isn't a verdict. Soreness in the target muscle at the start of its sessions, persisting week to week, is a signal in its own right. So is a pattern of lifts for that muscle going backwards. Either one, repeated, deserves attention. A single sore morning is mostly weather.

There's a related case: soreness from something you did outside the gym on a rest day, like a long hike or a football match. If a lift goes down after that, the extra activity is a fair explanation for the drop. It's not a sign your program has stopped working.


What to judge a workout by instead

Your training log. Did you beat last time on the same lift, at the same weight or with more reps, or with more reps in reserve? Over a few weeks, are those numbers trending up?

That's a slower, less satisfying receipt than not being able to sit down. It's also the one that actually measures the thing you care about, and it doesn't swing because you tried a new exercise this week. If you want the full version of how to read it, what counts as progressive overload walks through what's compared against what.

An honest concession before the end. Nothing here says soreness means you did something wrong either. Plenty of effective training makes people sore, especially exercises that load a muscle hard in a stretched position. The point isn't that soreness is bad. It's that it's not evidence, in either direction.

And one boundary: soreness is a dull, spread-out ache in the muscle. Sharp pain, pain in a joint, or pain that isn't easing after several days is a different thing entirely, and it's a reason to see a qualified professional rather than something a training article can sort out.

Soreness measures novelty, not progress. Your log measures progress.


Common questions

Does being sore mean you built muscle?

Not reliably. In one controlled study, a group that avoided soreness with a gradual start gained the same muscle size and strength as a group that was made very sore. Soreness tells you a session was unfamiliar, not that it worked.

Is it bad if I am not sore after a workout?

No. Training the same movements regularly makes muscles much less prone to soreness, which is a well documented adaptation called the repeated bout effect. Experienced lifters often feel little soreness from sessions that are still working.

Should I train a muscle that is still sore?

If the muscle you are about to train is still sore when the session starts, note it, because that is a sign it may not have recovered from last time. Sharp pain, joint pain or pain that does not fade is different and is a reason to see a qualified professional.

Why do some muscles get sore and others never do?

People and muscles vary a lot in how sore they get, even among experienced lifters. Exercises that load a muscle hard while it is stretched, or that are new to you, tend to cause more soreness. There is no evidence that this variation tracks how much each muscle grows.

Back to the blog